Subject: Postural control during kneeling




 

Athens Authentication Point

Welcome!

To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.

If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.

My Menu

Marked Items

Alerts

Order History

Saved Items

All

Favorites

中文(简体)

中文(繁體)

English

Deutsch

한국어

日本語

Français

Español

العربية

Русский


Back to: Journal Article \ Journal \ Journal  

Previous Item    Next Item

Journal Article

 


 

Postural control during kneeling

Journal

Experimental Brain Research

Publisher

Springer Berlin / Heidelberg

ISSN

0014-4819 (Print) 1432-1106 (Online)

Category

Research Article

DOI

10.1007/s00221-008-1308-x

Subject Collection

Biomedical and Life Sciences

SpringerLink Date

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Add to marked items

Add to shopping cart

Add to saved items

Permissions & Reprints

Recommend this article

 

 PDF (442.4 KB) HTML



Rinaldo André Mezzarane  and André Fabio Kohn1

(1) 

Neuroscience Program and Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Universidade de São Paulo, EPUSP, PTC, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav.3, n.158, Cx Postal 61548, CEP 05424-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received: 15 June 2007  Accepted: 7 February 2008  Published online: 19 February 2008

Abstract  Postural control was studied when the subject was kneeling with erect trunk in a quiet posture and compared to that obtained during quiet standing. The analysis was based on the center of pressure motion in the sagittal plane (CPx), both in the time and in the frequency domains. One could assume that postural control during kneeling would be poorer than in standing because it is a less natural posture. This could cause a higher CPx variability. The power spectral density (PSD) of the CPx obtained from the experimental data in the kneeling position (KN) showed a significant decrease at frequencies below 0.3 Hz compared to upright (UP) (P < 0.01), which indicates less sway in KN. Conversely, there was an increase in fast postural oscillations (above 0.7 Hz) during KN compared to UP (P < 0.05). The root mean square (RMS) of the CPx was higher for UP (P < 0.01) while the mean velocity (MV) was higher during KN (P < 0.05). Lack of vision had a significant effect on the PSD and the parameters estimated from the CPx in both positions. We also sought to verify whether the changes in the PSD of the CPx found between the UP and KN positions were exclusively due to biomechanical factors (e.g., lowered center of gravity), or also reflected changes in the neural processes involved in the control of balance. To reach this goal, besides the experimental approach, a simple feedback model (a PID neural system, with added neural noise and controlling an inverted pendulum) was used to simulate postural sway in both conditions (in KN the pendulum was shortened, the mass and the moment of inertia were decreased). A parameter optimization method was used to fit the CPx power spectrum given by the model to that obtained experimentally. The results indicated that the changed anthropometric parameters in KN would indeed cause a large decrease in the power spectrum at low frequencies. However, the model fitting also showed that there were considerable changes also in the neural subsystem when the subject went from standing to kneeling. There was a lowering of the proportional and derivative gains and an increase in the neural noise power. Additional increases in the neural noise power were found also when the subject closed his eyes.

Keywords  Human - Power spectral density - Center of pressure - Model - Neural noise - Inverted pendulum



 

Rinaldo André Mezzarane

Email: rinaldo@leb.usp.br

References secured to subscribers.

more options

Find


Within all content

Within this journal

Export this article

Export this article as RIS | Text

 



Frequently asked questions | General information on journals and books | Send us your feedback | Impressum | Contact

© Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media

Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, © Copyright Information

Remote Address: 76.122.221.57 • Server: mpweb04

HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Safari/525.18